Loading...
Loading...
New York Times Got Played by a Telehealth Scam and Called It the Future of AI A Hacker News thread highlights a Sunil Pai piece about the evolving role of developer relations (DevRel) in the age of powerful AI 'cheat code' tools. A DevRel practitioner with UX experience argues demand for DevRel is growing as teams need guides to explore AI’s possibilities, build demos, and bridge product, design, sales, and community. The post emphasizes DevRel’s shift toward solution architecture, prototyping,
New York Times Got Played by a Telehealth Scam and Called It the Future of AI
New York Times Got Played by a Telehealth Scam and Called It the Future of AI
A Hacker News thread highlights a Sunil Pai piece about the evolving role of developer relations (DevRel) in the age of powerful AI 'cheat code' tools. A DevRel practitioner with UX experience argues demand for DevRel is growing as teams need guides to explore AI’s possibilities, build demos, and bridge product, design, sales, and community. The post emphasizes DevRel’s shift toward solution architecture, prototyping, and domain-specific work (e.g., helping biologists streamline bioinformatics workflows). The takeaway: DevRel becomes a multidisciplinary function — product-facing, technically hands-on, and community-centric — essential for helping organizations and users adopt and apply emerging AI capabilities. This reframes DevRel as strategic for AI-driven product development.
An experienced user underscores that AI is a practical tool for solving technical problems: after decades of seeking forum help, they used AI to update HTML in 30 minutes to implement self-scrolling links, and AI also clarified gravity slingshot mechanics for spaceflight. The article highlights quick, actionable assistance on web development and complex scientific concepts as examples of productive AI use. It matters because these everyday wins demonstrate AI’s utility for developers, hobbyists, educators and others needing rapid technical explanations or code fixes, while implicitly arguing against sensationalized fears about AI.