Loading...
Loading...
Track AIPAC, a political advocacy site linked to Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption, launched a tool it says lets users track U.S. members of Congress and congressional candidates and “follow the money” related to AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group. The page promotes features such as browsing “Members of Congress,” “Candidates for Congress,” and “Our Endorsed Candidates,” and solicits donations to an “anti-AIPAC PAC.” It also calls for policy changes including “ENFORCE FARA” (the Foreign Agents
A Maine lawsuit could force U.S. courts to revisit the legal foundations that enabled today’s super PAC-driven campaign finance system, potentially narrowing the post–Citizens United era. The article argues that while Citizens United v. FEC (2010) is widely blamed for unleashing “independent expenditures,” a second decision—SpeechNow v. FEC (D.C. Circuit, 2010)—removed limits on contributions to super PACs and has never been tested at the Supreme Court. It cites recent spending data: in the last election, PACs and super PACs outspent candidate campaigns combined; about $2 billion in “independent” spending was dark money; and independent expenditures now exceed a quarter of election spending. Super PACs have already spent nearly $250 million this cycle, including donations tied to AI and crypto interests.
A Maine lawsuit could force courts to revisit the legal framework that enabled today’s super PAC funding system, potentially narrowing the impact of Citizens United-era rulings. The article argues that anonymous “dark money” now dominates US federal elections: in the last election, PACs and super PACs reportedly spent more than all candidate campaigns combined, with $2 billion in independent spending coming from undisclosed sources. Super PACs have already spent nearly $250 million this cycle, with donors tied to artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency seeking policy influence. Beyond the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC, the piece highlights SpeechNow v. FEC (2010), a DC Circuit ruling that removed limits on contributions to super PACs and was never tested at the Supreme Court after the Obama Justice Department declined to appeal.
Track AIPAC, a project linked to Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption, is promoting a website that aims to help users monitor U.S. political spending and endorsements connected to the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC. The page encourages visitors to “track your congressmembers” and “follow the money,” offering navigation to sections for Members of Congress, Candidates for Congress, and “Our Endorsed Candidates.” It also solicits donations to an “anti-AIPAC PAC” and highlights policy demands including “Reject AIPAC,” “Enforce FARA” (the Foreign Agents Registration Act), and “Overturn Citizens United.” The content is primarily advocacy and fundraising, with no specific spending figures, dates, or documented transactions provided in the excerpt, limiting verification of any claims.
Track AIPAC, a political advocacy site linked to Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption, launched a tool it says lets users track U.S. members of Congress and congressional candidates and “follow the money” related to AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group. The page promotes features such as browsing “Members of Congress,” “Candidates for Congress,” and “Our Endorsed Candidates,” and solicits donations to an “anti-AIPAC PAC.” It also calls for policy changes including “ENFORCE FARA” (the Foreign Agents Registration Act) and “OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED,” referencing the 2010 Supreme Court decision on campaign finance. The content provided includes no spending totals, dates, or methodology, so the scope and data sources of the tracking tool are unclear.