github / gitea / sourcehut

From GitHub to Codeberg/Forgejo

  submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/jonas_h"> /u/jonas_h </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.jonashietala.se/blog/2026/04/28/from_github_to_codebergforgejo/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1syddaw/from_github_to_codebergforgejo/">[comments]</a></span>

A Hacker News thread asked about GitHub alternatives and commenters recommended several options: Codeberg and Forgejo (self-hosted/Euro-based), Gitea and GitLab (hosted or self-hosted, with GitLab noted as US-based), SourceHut as a paid, privacy-minded service, and Radicle for decentralized workflows. Participants debated self-hosting versus cloud use, the role of free/libre open-source software (FLOSS), and whether AI-generated code changes the economics of building alternatives. The thread highlights concerns about vendor lock-in, privacy, and community maintenance. It matters because developers and organizations weighing migration, control, and governance of source code platforms need viable choices beyond GitHub.

GitHub is experiencing a service outage reported by users on Hacker News, with the official GitHub Status page confirming issues. Commenters note recurring reliability problems since Microsoft’s acquisition and link third-party uptime trackers showing recent degradation, while others report UI failures (e.g., missing pull requests). Community responses urge switching to self-hosted or alternative platforms such as Gitea, Forgejo, SourceHut, and Codeberg, citing better uptime and control. The outage is raising concerns about dependency on a single major code-hosting platform and the operational risk for businesses and developer workflows.