Loading...
Loading...
Tesla has officially introduced a supervised Full Self-Driving (FSD) variant in China, classed as an L2 driver-assistance system that requires attentive drivers and places legal responsibility on humans. The rollout aligns China with other markets where Tesla offers supervised FSD, accompanied by local hiring for testing across multiple cities. The move comes amid mounting controversy: a fraud lawsuit by Chinese owners has opened in court, and Reuters interviews with former Tesla AI trainers and labelers question FSD’s safety claims and internal practices. Regulators, consumers and competitors will watch closely as legal challenges and safety concerns clash with Tesla’s global expansion of advanced driver-assist features.
Tesla offering supervised FSD in China matters because it extends advanced driver-assistance services into a major EV market and tests Tesla's software, regulatory alignment, and user acceptance in new road environments. Tech teams should watch integration demands for localization, data handling, and regulatory compliance.
Dossier last updated: 2026-05-28 23:54:10
A Tesla owner-led team completed the first fully hands-off crossing of Canada using Tesla’s FSD, driving 3,760 miles (6,051 km) from Vancouver to Halifax without any human interventions over 4 days 21 hours. The trip used FSD v14.3.3 (part of the 2026 spring update) and reportedly handled highways, varied weather, construction zones, and automated supercharger parking and plug-in maneuvers. Tesla AI chief Ashok Elluswamy publicly congratulated the team; driver David Moss has previously logged long zero-intervention runs in the U.S. The feat highlights FSD’s matured path-planning neural networks and relaxed driver-monitoring thresholds in the update, but Tesla still classifies supervised FSD as Level 2, so regulatory and safety oversight questions remain. This civilian proof-of-concept signals closer practical deployment of unsupervised driving.
Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' fraud lawsuit gets first hearing in China
Reuters reported that several current and former Tesla AI trainers and data labelers distrust Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, with nine interviewed insiders largely giving negative assessments. Seven labelers said they would not ride in an FSD-enabled Tesla; one former employee said they wouldn’t take a Robotaxi “even for money.” Workers described reviewing large volumes of driving footage to train FSD and frequently observing unsafe behaviors like speeding, which they say management did not prioritize. The accounts challenge Elon Musk’s public claims about FSD’s readiness for unsupervised driving and raise renewed safety and regulatory concerns about FSD’s suitability for public roads.
报道称特斯拉因FSD功能在中国面临诉讼
爱沙尼亚批准特斯拉FSD上路，该公司表示即将开始推广
A Chinese court has opened hearings in a lawsuit brought by 10 car owners against Tesla over alleged fraud related to its Full Self-Driving (FSD) offering, according to the article’s title. The plaintiffs are seeking more than 3.95 million yuan in compensation. The case centers on claims that Tesla’s marketing, sales, or delivery of FSD did not match what buyers were led to expect, though no further details are provided. The proceedings matter because they could affect how advanced driver-assistance features are advertised and sold in China, and may influence consumer protection enforcement and automaker compliance around autonomous-driving claims. No dates, court location, or specific allegations beyond “fraud” are available from the title alone.
Reuters reports that Tesla’s claim that its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software is up to 10 times safer than human drivers is unsupported by its data and internal practices. Interviews with former Tesla data labelers and an ex-autonomy engineer reveal frequent failures—collisions with animals, missed braking, and near-misses with children—and heavy manual intervention to prepare demo routes. Safety researchers say Tesla’s comparison methods are misleading, conflating severe airbag-triggering crashes with broader federal crash stats and not adjusting for vehicle age or usage patterns. Competitor Waymo uses stricter, localized comparisons and peer-reviewed methods. The story undermines executive safety claims and signals FSD is not yet ready for safe, large-scale deployment.
FSD监督版入华又进一步，但马斯克还在乎吗？
特斯拉官宣 FSD 入华
特斯拉监督版 FSD 官宣登陆中国
Tesla announced on May 21 that its supervised Full Self-Driving (FSD) system will be available for use in China. The brief 36Kr report cites Tesla’s official communication stating the rollout of a supervised FSD variant in the Chinese market, signaling Tesla’s expansion of advanced driver-assistance features into one of the world’s largest automotive and EV markets. This matters for regulators, competitors, and Chinese consumers because supervised FSD introduces higher levels of assisted driving functionality while still requiring human oversight, impacting local regulation, safety debates, and competitive dynamics among EV makers and autonomous-driving suppliers.
Tesla announced that its supervised Full Self-Driving (FSD) system is now available for use in China, joining other supported regions including the US, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, the Netherlands and Lithuania. The supervised FSD is classified as an L2 driver assistance system under UN R-171, requiring drivers to remain attentive and ready to take control, with legal responsibility resting on the driver. Europe has moved to subscription-only pricing for supervised FSD after Tesla ended lifetime purchases globally in February 2026; Lithuanian subscribers pay €99/month (discounted to €49 for prior Enhanced Autopilot owners). Tesla is recruiting real-world Autopilot test technicians across nine Chinese cities, signaling expanded local testing and rollout efforts.